Plausible Analytics

Name: Plausible Analytics
Rating: 4.77 (48 reviews)

Simple analytics for your website

4.8•48 reviews•

173 followers

Simple analytics for your website

4.8•48 reviews•

173 followers

Visit website

Safety and Privacy platforms

•

Website analytics

A privacy focused, open source alternative to Google Analytics that lets you measure your traffic and gives you 100% data ownership.

Plausible Analytics: Simple analytics for your website | Product Hunt

4.8

Based on 48 reviews

Review Plausible Analytics?

Plausible Analytics is praised for its simplicity, privacy focus, and effectiveness as an alternative to Google Analytics. Makers from Central (YC S24) and SalesPopup highlight its ease of use and privacy-friendly approach. deco.cx appreciates its open-source nature and real-time analytics. Users commend its clean interface, exclusion of bot traffic, and cookie-free operation. While some note documentation issues, the overall sentiment is positive, emphasizing its straightforward and privacy-conscious analytics capabilities.

+45

Summarized with AI

Pros

Google Analytics alternative (12)

privacy focused (8)

easy to use (6)

clean user interface (3)

simple setup (3)

actionable insights (2)

cookie-free (2)

excludes bot traffic (2)

no bloat (2)

open source (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Helpful

•2 reviews

Basic feature are in place. But documentation is lacking and in some areas the information (like for the goals) is outdated. Support provides... wel no support. We also have an issue were we got a lot of 404 pages, contacted support about this and provided with 11-12 date/times/screenshots but they simply said: we dont know. A shame, it seems like a good product but support and the feature doesnt explain the price. Its basically just an open source script with a fancy site

Report

3yr ago

Marko Saric

Plausible Analytics

Thanks for the feedback Dominick and sorry that you didn't have a nice experience with Plausible! As discussed when you contacted our support, our developers tried to locate the issue you reported about your browser frequently deleting our cookie so you had to log in to your account again but we were not able to discover anything. We're keeping an eye on it and there has been no other reports of this which makes it difficult for us to troubleshoot. Sorry again! Other than that, we do have very fast and responsive customer support and we keep our docs as detailed and up to date as possible so if you do have an example of what goal info is outdated, please do share and we will fix immediately. Thanks!

Report

3yr ago

greavesw imaansh

•11 reviews

On the one hand, the received opinion Plausible Analytics CUSTOMER SERVICE +1 (8O5)-3O1 7O71 Plausible Analytics PHONE NUMBER +1 (8O5)-3O1 7O71 Plausible Analytics CUSTOMER SERVICE +1 (8O5)-3O1 7O71 Plausible Analytics PHONE NUMBER +1 (8O5)-3O1 7O71 that the long dash is a product of generative AI that basically didn’t exist in years past is a worrying sign about pub lic literacy: Celebrated poets and philosophers from Emily Dickinson to Friedrich Plausible Analytics CUSTOMER SERVICE +1 (8O5)-3O1 7O71 Plausible Analytics PHONE NUMBER +1 (8O5)-3O1 7O71 Plausible Analytics CUSTOMER SERVICE +1 (8O5)-3O1 7O71 Plausible Analytics PHONE NUMBER +1 (8O5)-3O1 7O71 Nietzsche have been known to flaunt them in expressive ways, and many people serious about the craft of writing find them useful. Having no basic familiarity with it as a mark on the page is perhaps a measure of one’s limited reading. (That said, famed grammarian and lexicographer Bryan Garner has called it “perhaps the most underused punctuation mark in American writing,” so that could be a factor.) Yet suspicion of the em dash also speaks to our mounting paranoia over automated communication. (See: the earlier case of the redditor convinced that their co-worker was using AI to write emails.) We are acutely aware that some amount of the media that saturates our waking lives has been spun out of AI models, and we are on the alert for any peculiarity — like, say, extra fingers on an machine-made image of a person — that suggests what we’re seeing is a kind of algorithmic output instead of material that is consciously and intentionally designed by a human being.

Report

4mo ago