Nika

"Why shouldn't artificial intelligence replace you?"

Yesterday I met my friend after 2 years, and of course, after such a long time, we had a lot to talk about.

I was excitedly talking about technology and what AI can do, since he is not primarily from a tech background.

Suddenly, he surprised me with one question: (He got me.) 😅

"Tell me, why shouldn't AI replace you?"

And it's really hard to answer this, because AI is starting to be much better at tech/online things than the majority of the population.

What would your answer be?

Imagine this as a test, that your employer or customer asks this. – What argument would you use to convince him that you are better than AI?

151 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Melih Can Demir

Why AI Should Not Fully Replace Human Developers


There is a critical distinction between performing a task and simulating it and this difference lies at the heart of why AI should not fully replace human developers.


AI does not truly understand documents; it replicates the statistical patterns of the words they contain. It lacks the subtle, experience driven judgment required for complex tasks. For example, AI cannot grasp the intent behind code it merely reconstructs the syntax. This often leads to outputs that appear functional but are internally flawed, inconsistent, or unstable over time.


In software engineering, the goal is not just to produce code that works today, but to design systems that are maintainable, scalable, and resilient to future demands. While AI can rapidly generate multi-layered architectures, it does so without awareness of context, long-term constraints, or unpredictable edge cases. As a result, the systems it builds are often brittle likely to fail in scenarios it cannot anticipate.


Furthermore, AI lacks responsibility and ethical awareness. It cannot understand the real-world consequences of its output. A single misstep in code could affect someone's health, financial security, or personal data. Vulnerabilities like prompt injection demonstrate that placing AI at the center of mission-critical decisions is risky and potentially dangerous.

Human developers play a vital role as the decision-makers and ethical guardians of software systems. Their value is not just in writing code, but in combining technical skill with foresight, experience, and accountability.


In this context, AI is best viewed as a powerful tool a sophisticated instrument that enhances productivity when guided by human judgment. It can automate narrow, well-defined tasks. But the responsibility for architecture, security, and long-term impact must remain in human hands.


AI may assist, but it should not replace.

Nika

@melihcandemir Congratulations! :D AI replaced you :D

Melih Can Demir

@busmark_w_nika Haha to be fair... I usually write my raw thoughts first, then refine them with AI assistance.

So maybe it has replaced me or maybe we’ve just merged. 😄🧠🤖

Nika

@melihcandemir The answer was quite extensive so I was thinking it was solely by ChatGPT :D

Martin Rue

Better? I'd say that we're good at different things.

The dictionary has more words than I do, but I use them better.

AI has more patterns than I do, but I can create new ones that it has never seen.

True innovation doesn't come out of AI alone because it requires creating something new, that wasn't there before. Humans are better at true creativity and art. AI wasn't build to do that.

But together, humans and AI can make a better team.

Nika

@martin_rue Something has to be true about this. Yesterday (or the whole weekend) collaborated with ChatGPT to create some good copy for advertising – I am quite satisfied with what we accomplished together. I am pretty curious what the client says about that.

Martin Rue

@busmark_w_nika Good luck with it!

Yi Zheng

Good question, my answer:
My value lies not in competing with AI, but in harnessing it with my empathy, creativity, and sense of responsibility to solve real problems that it cannot even see. 🐶

Nika

@partick_support for example? What kind of problems?

Yi Zheng

@busmark_w_nika For example, figuring out what my friend really means when he says, “I'm fine.” 😳Or deciding how to compliment my friend on his signature dish, which “has a very innovative flavor.”😌

Nika

@partick_support Hahaha, yeah, but have you seen that video where participants tested new ChatGPT, they had the camera turned on and AI could "read the people in the room" – their facial expressions? It is becoming extremely good.

Yi Zheng

@busmark_w_nika I haven't seen it yet, but it sounds interesting. 😄AI Technological change is indeed developing rapidly.

Yi Zheng

@busmark_w_nika “Perhaps it's knowing when to nod in agreement with the client's ‘brilliant idea’ that is doomed to fail during a meeting.”:)

Muhammad Sarmad Hafeez
Because there are different levels of consciousness and different levels of empathy and ethics. The AI created even evolved would not have the human empathy no matter what is its level of consciousness is.
Nika

@muhammad_sarmad_hafeez Probably yes, they cannot experience bad things that humans usually do.

Tera Bitcoins

Ai will tell you what you want to listen/read, I will tell you what you need to hear/know!

Nika

@terabitcoins Yes, AI is quite submissive and kind at first :D Depending on how you trained it :D

Mahmudul Hasan Manik

As a human you may can understand what is AI Generated content and whats not. In the same way AI Can do everything but that can't feel you as human, at a time you need to feel human touch everywhere. And for this 1 reason AI can't replace you.

Nika

@mhmanik02 I think that some AI-generated things feel like humans. How do you detect them?

Leandro Sardi

@busmark_w_nika As a solo-founder, I'd like AI manages all the daily tasks of my operations.

By now, AI is a just copilot for me. It increases my productivity 10X, what is amazing.
But cannot replaces a human person 100%.

What will happen the day that AI become fully autonomous?
I know: nobody predict the future, but we can take a look at the history.

Every new technology killed jobs in the short term, and created new jobs in the long term.

I believe: The quality and quantity of the jobs in the long term will be higher.
New industries will surge.
Which industries? Nobody knows yet.

Nika

@leandro_sardi TL;DR: Keep watching how we are replaced, and maybe we will comeup with something better to not get bored! :D

Kaustubh K

I'd say "AI is meant to be a tool". The usefulness of the tool depends on the user of the tool. AI is a once-in-a-lifetime revolution. Sure - AI writes better than me and it can create images and videos better than I can.

Which means - I can use it to be 100x more productive and do amazing things. If AI is replacing me (ie. taking my job), I'd better be doing something better with AI and not do a job that AI can do.

Therefore, AI can't replace me.

Nika

@kaustubhkatdare Collaboration with AI is crucial now. Those who pay attention to synergy over competition are real winners.

Mark Heijnekamp
Well there are two answers I would give: 1: to stop an AI hidden agenda that might cause human extinction 2: would be less fun without me
Nika

@mark_heijnekamp I love the second point. Really, we babysit AI! :D

Anuraag Tyagi

Great question- and honestly, a necessary one.

If AI is outperforming average output, the only real defense is not being average.

Here’s how I see it:

AI is incredible at patterns, probabilities, and past data.

But it lacks context, curiosity, and consequence.

  1. It can generate a strategy, but won’t challenge it based on your market nuances.

  2. It can write a line of code, but won’t ask why that feature even matters.

  3. It can mimic creativity, but doesn’t care if the work resonates.

That’s the gap: Human judgment, motivation, and accountability.

Unless AI starts to get contextual.

That’s exactly why we built an AI platform that reads your website like a buyer, not just a bot. It scores clarity, flags fluff, and suggests sharper messaging. Context-aware. Outcome-first.

So, yes, if you’re doing average work, AI will replace you. But if you're building AI that thinks like your customer, you're ahead of the game

Nika

@anuraag_tyagi It can be so good that it is unrealistic – it created a photo of an actress with her kid. But she doesn't have a kid. AI is good predominantly at faking! :D

Fei C.

AI lacks the human touch: empathy, creative nuance and the ability to adapt strategies based on decades of real-world experience. These qualities are irreplaceable when it comes to complex problem-solving.

Nika

@feichen_ Do you think that AI can gain some of those in the future as it is evolving? Because it can be really good at faking interest and empathy.

Zagita

Ahaha.. Great question! I would say..

"If AI replaced me, who'd send you those ridiculous memes at 3 AM? Or annoy you with terrible puns? Sure, it might be 100x more efficient... but can an AI roast you with just the right amount of sarcasm? Didn't think so. 😏"

(Also, my caffeine addiction and questionable life choices add character to the workplace. ChatGPT can't replicate that chaos.)

Nika

@rani_zagita Valid answer, the thing is that AI will do this when you set it up for such activities. But yeah, punching people is more offline activity than online :D

Manu Goel
Launching soon!
AI without HI* doesn’t work especially for tasks that matter. People who have used AI would know that. AI is of course a huge accelerator. So, we can achieve much more at very high speeds. That’s how I look at it. AI is not meant to replace but to enable to dream bigger and faster. HI*= Human intelligence
Immanuel Rajadurai

Accountablity