Daniel Stuski

I see it more as complimentary to a number of roles such as marketing etc, and it taking a more prominent roles in industries such as lab work, research, driving.

Hey Product Hunters We all know that building audience and community is a superpower. Building a personal brand also pays off: more people support you during the launch, you can easily find beta testers, and validate new ideas. I went from 0 to 4300 followers on Twitter in 4 months. Here're 15 one-sentence tips: 0-100 followers 1. Use DM to find like-minded people. 2. Treat your Twitter account like a product: set up a value proposition, tone of voice, and "competitor analysis." 3. Set daily targets on posts and replies (ex. 3 posts, 30 replies). 100-1000 followers 4. Make weekly content planning. 5. Experiment a lot. 6. Get inspired by new Tweet formats from influencers. 7. Re-use content: 1 thread can be divided into 10 1-liners. 8. Don't be disappointed with low engagement, it happens even with big accounts. 9. Engage with big accounts right after they post smth (Notify button will help ) 1000+ followers 10. If you want a loyal and active audience, respond to comments (not only with GIFs haha). 11. Be a human, with all this AI flex, people want more life content. 12. Don't post just theory, post your experience and examples. #buildinpublic 13. Analyze what content works better for you and double down on it. 14. Try to go viral: analyze viral content examples and implement them. 15. Experiment with your bio because the conversion from visitor to follower highly depends on it. Try to implement at least 1 advice today and see how it's going Do you have any tips to add? ________________ If you want to learn more, here's the article about growing from 0 to 1000 in 50 days based on my experience https://blog.makerbox.club/1000-...

Hey Product Hunters It took me over 1 week to build a working MVP for my AI-powered tool. I was ready to launch it when I realized that OpenAI needs to verify the app before launching it to real users. Instead of waiting for the end of the verification process, I spent a few hours building a landing page that briefly describes the problem I try to solve and a "How it works" section. But why a landing page? A landing page focuses on the problem that the product solves. MVP focuses on the solution to that problem. Often, MVP may or may not actually solve the problem. When building an MVP too early, you might waste time and resources on something that might not work. A landing page, on the other hand, tests whether there s even a market for the problem you re solving. A lot of makers think they need to have a product before they can start testing their startup idea. But that s not true. You can use a landing page to validate your startup idea without spending weeks (or months) building a prototype. Creating a landing page can be incredibly quick and cheap. You can even use no-code tools to create a simple landing page in just a few hours (I coded it myself in Next.js). Once your landing page is live, you can start driving traffic to it through paid ads, social media, or blog posts (like this one). That way you can measure whether people are actually interested in what you re offering. Just pay attention to things like conversion rate and time on site. Make sure to track where the users come from and how they act. Tools like Google Analytics, Plausible, Hotjar, or Mixpanel might come in handy. If you find that people are bouncing off your site quickly or they re not converting, that s a sign that there might not be a market for your product. On the other hand, if people are staying on your site and signing up for your email list - that s a good sign that there is interest in what you re building. You can then take this information and decide whether to continue working on your MVP or pivot to something else. Which approach do you prefer - MVP or Landing Page? ________________ Here's a link to the mentioned landing page: https://www.CACideas.com