About
Software Developer with a passion for building scalable and efficient solutions. Experienced in backend and full-stack development, working with modern frameworks and ML. Always eager to learn new stuff!
Links
Badges
Forums
Has anyone tried to replace manual QA with OpenAI Operator or BrowserUse?
The idea is simple: let the AI behave like a user, clicking through the UI, validating expected results, and reporting anomalies. This obviously works for Web-products only.. I've been experimenting with just that replacing parts of some manual QA process using browser-native agents like OpenAI's Operator (or custom implementations via tools like BrowserUse) and it seems to work very well. Apprpximately optimizing 4 hours long "smoke"-test down to , like.. 20 minutes The only caveats are: - checklists - you have to document very clear expectations, which will be easy to follow and compare. AI-generated ones are not really reliable - authorization - no one wants to share credentials with 3rdparty cloud tools. So if you really want to secure that aspect - self-hosted open-source solutions (like BrowserUse) is the way to go Have any of you guys tried something like that? What was your experience?
We placed 3rd on Product Hunt and earned $543
Just launched IndieMerger (co-founder matching platform) on Product Hunt with minimal preparation and wanted to share the real results.
The numbers:
3rd place for the day
1305 visitors to the site
210 sign-ups (16% conversion)
7 purchases
$543 total revenue (0.5% visitor-to-customer conversion)