@wnmio yes. Actually we used to be user of PresskitHero, and it was a great tool. But we quickly noticed that sime things were missing. For example some journalists asked us to be able to search some words in the whole presskit. We also wanted to get some analytics about who is reading our presskit. Those feature are live on Prkit.co
Besides prkit.co was initially supposed to be a private project for our clients and a lot of startups wanted to use it so we decided to go public.
Now Prkit.co is live and booming we are very happy to become a presskithero competitor now because we believe that competition is a great for business.
@falemaster From a 3rd party perspective, I don't think @wnmio is concerned about having competition, it's that you lifted their home page copy word for word, some of their UI. That's really not cool. It's one thing to use and analyse a product and decide you can do it better, it's another thing to mimic how you talk about it:
PRESSKITHERO title copy: "Create a professional press kit for your company"
PRKIT (which I now notice comes up as PRESSKIT as the company name in the browser) title copy: "Create a professional press kit for your company"
PRESSKITHERO 2nd title copy: "All the information a journalist needs to cover your company in one place"
PRKIT 2nd title copy: "All the information a journalist needs to cover your company in one place."
Hmm....
@samrye_enspiral
1- its all about seo
2- what about the rest of the page ? Like 3 others section ?
3- how can you say the ui is similar ? It s like 1000% different.
4- We dont have so much text on our landing.
Anyway, as i told you before PKH was one of our inspiration, but is was not the only one. We even works with Pressking former ceo on this project and we also looked at pr.co
I assume when you launch a project with good competitor on the market you need to take the best from them as a starting point. Then you add the thing that makes you unique. You should try prkit.co and see how unique it is.
@falemaster sure I can appreciate you're defensive.
Just offering some friendly 3rd party perspectives on what it would feel like for the other party. I can understand that's awkward to hear in a public setting, so I apologise for causing you discomfort.
The idea is cool. IMHO, the demo needs work and the pricing is somehow confusing. You can make edits for 30 days (I get it) but what happens if you don't upgrade after that?
@morgam thanks for the kind words. Regarding the pricing your are right, it might be confusing. We are still thinking about it. Our idea is to let all users create their Presskit for free, and then after 30 days they will not be able to edit it unless they subscribe... We are open to every suggestions about that
@falemaster Great idea. My recommendation: Offer three tiers: Free (and it’s always free) with one very basic but thorough kit. This can be targeted toward solo devs and people building MVPs. Next could be the Pro kit, which is one-time paid, and offers a more thorough and comprehensive kit. And finally, Enterprise, which is a subscription/or pay-per-component kit for bigger companies releasing large or multiple products that need your services on a rolling basis—you can include in this tier one-on-one consultations, feedback-as-a-service, etc. The more bespoke/flexible/thorough, the more you can charge.
@morgam I co-sign that, pricing model is weird and confusing. I didn't get it until I read maker's comment above. I also agree with @elliot_s_volkman comment.
@tsyinka The last few days I worked on improving the layout (fonts, responsive view, spacing, etc..), have you seen the updates on your press kit recently? I would love to hear your thoughts, here, or hello@presskithero.com if you want.
Prkit.co
Prkit.co
AirConsole
Prkit.co
Corkdork
Outkarma
Outkarma