Good morning and thanks for posting and supporting www.crowdacure.com. This is awesome. We want to advance medical research by crowdfunding life-changing, but hard to fund medical research. The projects are peer-reviewed before accessing the platform and the outcome of the peer review outcome is shared in transparence on the platform. This way the public can make truly informed decisions. Please give us your feedback, that would be fantastic. Sagit
@weiss_sagit Hi, in my experience it takes time until something is searchable. I think its marketing, you have to invest in marketing to get the votes, build an audience, people who believe in your product, it has the potential, but potential is nothing without actions. Conduct an outreach campaign to all the people who had shown interest in your app in the past, bring in new votes via social/forums/PR/magazines things like that...
If you'll look at the top 1000, you'll rarely see there apps without some background.
@iris_ben_david thanks a lot for a great question and for your support! First answer is yes because we have on the platform only projects who got audited by the book. They have also been audited for funding hardship. And ghe audit (peer review) details is shared on the campaign page. Second yes because we make sure the project information is accessible to everybody, with for example visual representations third, yes because the crowd decisions are an alternative to the expert and hence authorise the emergence of alternative projects. This jas the potential to innovate innovation in medicine- as long as projects are curated
Crowdacure
Crowdacure
Hotmark
Crowdacure
Hotmark
Crowdacure
Crowdacure