M

@rrhoover and @ekuyda opinion :)

@rrhoover we want Messenger to become the best place for people to not only communicate with their friends and loved ones, but also with businesses (who likes calling or emailing businesses anyway?!). There are two types of interactions we're trying to cover, the threads with brands you care about and you want to have a "relationship" with, and intents that need to be fulfilled — for which it doesn't really matter who/how it's done as long as it's done well. M is aimed at covering the second use case. We think we may be uniquely positioned to solve that hard problem, so we're going to try!

@davidmarcus What is the ratio of human/AI with M? Would be great to try it!

@davidmarcus Congrats on the launch! Really excited about this. Especially the opportunity for Messenger to capture intent-driven activity. fyi: wrote a TC article about that very subject (intent vs passive activity) and how you guys are like you said in a unique position to solve that hard problem: techcrunch.com/2015/08/11/its-operating-systems-vs-messaging-apps-in-the-battle-for-techs-next-frontier/

@rrhoover Tried to get on Magic but they want 3k to start and $100/hr. Have you heard any feedback on efficacy?

@brian_lovin 'Computers are a bicycle for your mind, M is a bicycle for your assistant.'

@brian_lovin very cool!

@brian_lovin Awesome Brian! Thanks for posting this :)

@brian_lovin Love this space! See my essay: http://www.nirandfar.com/2015/07...

@brian_lovin another interesting company in the space http://www.commersational.com

@rezakhadjavi @robfdaniel @jeremygoldbrg @davidmarcus @rrhoover That is what I am thinking...